Dan Larkin advises boards, executives, and security leaders on the threats bureaucracy keeps them from seeing clearly — drawing on decades inside the FBI, NCFTA, and private-sector security leadership.
Or call directly: (412) 475-2040
Over three decades in the FBI, I learned that the most significant organized crime and cyber cases almost never showed up ready-made for prosecution. They came from strong intelligence — well-placed informants, cooperating witnesses, and increasingly, sharp subject-matter experts from cross-sector partners willing to dig in alongside law enforcement.
Too often, though, victims who came forward were turned away: told their case wasn't significant enough, that it belonged with another field office, that an overseas actor made prosecution unlikely, or that without a specific loss figure there was nothing to act on. I watched good information go nowhere because the system wasn't built to catch it.
That frustration is what led to building the NCFTA, and it's the same instinct behind this site. There's a kind of passion and clarity that goes dormant in people and organizations when they're told often enough that a threat isn't worth pursuing. My work now is about stirring that back up — helping boards and security leaders stop watching from the sidelines and start building the intelligence, partnerships, and strategy it actually takes to get ahead of a threat, rather than explaining it after the fact.
Dan spent more than three decades in the FBI and private-sector security leadership, where he built one of the most unique global public/private threat-intelligence alliances of his time — the National Cyber-Forensics & Training Alliance (NCFTA).
He now advises boards and executives on how to see past organizational blind spots, understand how threats actually develop, and move faster than the bureaucracy around them typically allows.
Dan's book lays out how self-imposed institutional boundaries — and no small amount of "institutional arrogance" — keep organizations from seeing the full threat landscape in front of them, and what it actually takes to build effective cross-sector partnerships instead.
Get the bookDan hosts conversations on the "Making It Personal" and International Task Force podcast series, and speaks on the vulnerabilities organizations face today, where government/industry/law-enforcement collaboration breaks down, and what's actually working.
Book Dan to speak"Dan Larkin's vision of a platform to drive the substantial public-private sector and global law enforcement collaboration needed to take on significant cyber threats led to the world's first cyber fusion center and was integral to Pittsburgh becoming the center of federal cyber enforcement efforts."Luke DemboskyFormer Deputy Assistant Attorney General for National Security & Cyber
"Creating teams that can cross bureaucratic boundaries and challenge the status quo are essential, as are the personal leadership traits needed to achieve critical goals. 'Ripping Off the Bureaucratic Blinders' addresses these challenges and the skills we should all aspire to employ as effective leaders."Admiral Thad AllenCommandant, U.S. Coast Guard (Retired)
"'Ripping Off the Bureaucratic Blinders' should be required reading for those seeking to create effective partnerships between the law enforcement community and the private sector. Dan's book clearly demonstrates the force multiplier that emanates from such alliances."Michael A. MasonFBI Executive Assistant Director (Retired)
Three ways to work together, depending on where your organization needs the most help right now.
A candid, outside read on where your organization is genuinely exposed — cutting through internal blind spots and giving your board a threat picture they can actually act on.
Request an assessmentPractical training for security teams and leadership on how threats actually develop — from emerging AI-enabled schemes to the fundamentals of intelligence-led defense.
Book a training sessionTalks and panel appearances on threat intelligence, public/private partnership, and the institutional habits that let preventable breaches happen. Drawn from three decades of cases.
See speaking topicsLarger cross-sector efforts Dan has proposed or is actively developing, originally detailed on this site's "Next Door" project pages. Each links to the full brief.
A framework for community impact, environmental responsibility, economic development, and credible oversight.
AI is already here, and so are the data centers, the business models, and the risks that come with them. Data centers are not going away. The real question is how they can be developed responsibly, so that growth strengthens a region instead of straining it.
I've spent my career bringing government, industry, and academia to the same table before a threat becomes a crisis. AI deserves the same approach: credible impact studies on what data centers mean for local power, water, and jobs; shared governance with clear accountability; and practical guardrails shaped by a cross-sector advisory committee of experts.
The goal is not to slow the AI future. It is to shape it responsibly, with a transparent scoring process and possibly a trusted "stamp of approval," so communities and businesses can move forward with confidence instead of fear.
"Don't give me your intelligence (or data). Bring it with you."
For decades, the default approach to sharing threat information was "just give us all your data and we'll figure it out." It failed. Data without context created noise, legal exposure, and mistrust.
Data only becomes intelligence when subject-matter experts who understand it work on it together in a neutral, trusted space. That was the model behind the NCFTA, and it's the model this AI effort is built on: the right experts around one table, bringing what they know with them.
Read the Data vs. Intelligence brief
Growth brings real benefits and legitimate concerns. Every major project should be evaluated for its effect on the surrounding community, not just the project site, over both the short and long term. Evidence should inform approvals, incentives, and ongoing accountability.
A credible framework makes expectations visible before incentives and approvals are granted: impact studies, environmental and water disclosures, energy plans, community-benefit and workforce commitments, compliance reporting, independent audits, and incentive clawbacks. Federal, state, and local responsibilities are different, and they complement each other.
Recommendation: shared governance with clear accountability.
Illustrative weighting. 90–100 exemplary • 75–89 responsible with minor conditions • 60–74 conditional • below 60 major revisions.
If you work in government, utilities, technology, manufacturing, financial services, or community development and want a seat at this table, I'd like to hear from you.
Short, pointed write-ups on complacency, intelligence development, and the institutional habits that let preventable threats through.
Conversations on threat intelligence, cross-sector partnership, and the origins of the International Task Force — including why it started in Pittsburgh.
Book Introduction
A short introduction to "Ripping Off the Bureaucratic Blinders" and the thinking behind it.
Watch
ITF Origins: Why Pittsburgh?
Series introduction on how and why the International Task Force took shape where it did.
Watch
Making It Personal — Episode 1
The first episode in the series, kicking off the "Making It Personal" conversations.
Watch
Development of the ITF — Episode 2
How the International Task Force came together in practice.
Watch
Foundations for Success — Episode 3
Andy Auld and Bilal Sen reflect on what made the ITF work, and where it might go next.
Watch
Tell me a little about your organization and what you need — an assessment, a training session, or a speaker — and I'll follow up directly.